Lifestyles of the poor and nameless
Friday, September 02, 2005 at 6:47 PM
Thoughts on Katrina
Watching the news for the past few days I've had a conflict of emotions. The anguish and despair is apparent on the faces of people whose worldly possessions can now fit in a garbage bag. My heart truly goes out to them. Then I hear these reports of my people raping others in the Astrodome, or looting electronics and other non-necessary items and it pisses me off. It makes me want to take off my belt and go beat some sense into them because if the reports are true, then we are only proving ourselves to be uncivilized, as has often been said.
When the tsunami hit last year, the afflicted were described as devastated and grief-stricken, but not looting and pillaging. The pictures showed them helping each other through the crisis, not laying on the ground spread-eagle after cops foiled their attempt to steal a postal truck. If store owners in Indonesia camped out with guns to prevent looters from taking over their stores, it sure didn't make any newspaper that I read. Many people say that it's because the N.O. afflicted are poor and lack resources...since when is that an excuse to behave like a savage? Last time I checked, the tsunami victims were mostly poor people as well.
I will be the first to admit that I have NEVER in life been through any kind of disaster like what's going on out there. I don't even know anyone who's lived through anything like it...aside from the few family friends who escaped the 2004 and 2005 storms in my parents' home country of Grenada.
But with that said, I really can't understand the violence that results from all this. Everyone complained that N.O. didn't get enough assistance....and when the government finally sends people out there, instead of the personnel being focused on feeding and transporting the people, now they have to worry about looters, rapists and angry mobs.
On the other hand, this could all be the result of biased journalism. As reported in this NYTimes article, storms are perfect breeding grounds for prejudice. After an 1889 flood in PA, Hungarians (the 19th century social outcasts) were accused of cutting off dead women's fingers to steal their wedding rings. The newspaper headline read "Drunken Hungarians, Dancing, Singing, Cursing, Fighting Amid the Ruins".
And now begins the blame game. According to a pre-9/11 Fed'l Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) report, the 3 most likely catastrophic disasters facing the U.S. were: 1- a terrorist attack on NY; 2- a major earthquake in San Francisco and 3-a hurricane strike on New Orleans. We've already seen 2 of 3, and weren't prepared for either; are we following the "3rd time's a charm" rule here?
I read this morning that aid for N.O. is coming from Jamaica, Dominican Republic, Columbia, Venezuela and Honduras among other places. Isn't it ironic that these poor countries who are struggling for themselves, still found a way to reach out to the U.S. before our own government did?
As my parents used to say: "all who can't hear must feel". And the U.S. government WILL feel when the waters recede. Don't be surprised if there's a class action suit against the government because of their inaction and apathy before and during this crisis. Just as the families of 9/11 victims made their claims, so too shall the people of N.O...and what a hefty bill it will be.
But rather than continue to run my mouth about the ills of the system, I'm going to take advantage of the 3 day weekend to go help out the relief efforts at the local Red Cross. I hope you will too. Godspeed.
Inside Man's two cents:
Katrina has put all my problems in perspective, I really don't much to complain about.
~
Love Me Or Leave Me Alone's two cents:
Excellent blog entry! I think a class action suit against the government is entirely possible, we've just got to get the so-called leaders of the Black community TOGETHER, instead of the scattered way they're speaking about the issue these past few days. We'll get it together though... I hope.
~
Dee's two cents:
what will a class action suit do? Not to say it is a bad thing. I just don't understand the concept. Shit happens. The government didn't directly do anything to anyone. The only thing I can think of is a suit on behalf of the state for the stabilization funds that were siphoned off for the war.
And in the end, we are paying for all of it. Our tax dollars pay for helicopters to fly or not fly. They also pay for the lawyers, the class action suits, the hush money. Everything. And money won't bring their loved ones back.
~
Queen Bee's two cents:
Class action suits will do what class action suits are intended to do: aggregate all claims arising out of a particular incident, instead of having a bunch of individuals taking pot shots at the target party.
Law suits never bring back loved ones....but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be filed. If wrong was done, then there should be compensation for it. If the government was aware of the dangers inherent in failing to fix the levee system, and ignored those dangers, then they should have to compensate people who suffered for it. Yeah, the taxpayers will end up footing the bill....but we're already paying for so much other crap that the government takes on (i.e. the war in Iraq) which doesn't do anything for the American people. At least if the money went to hurricane victims, I'd feel like it's a more justifiable expense.
~
The Coach's two cents:
I've grown tired of the conservative media types (O'Reilly) calling out the looters and snipers. Until I see someone walking through the streets with 5 big screen TVs, I won't believe it.
~
Queen Bee's two cents:
Coach...you should have been watching Oprah's show live from N.O. this week. I don't consider her a "conservative media type", but she sure did address those issues.
~
© Queen Bee 2005 // Powered for Blogger by Blogger templates